Mentoring Program Health Check
Built for program owners

12 questions  ·  3 minutes  ·  one maturity score

How much of your mentoring program holds by itself?

Most mentoring programs are not badly designed. They quietly stop running in week three. Score what is consistently true today - not what is planned for the next cohort.

Start the health check ↓

Score current reality

Three dimensions. One operating picture.

The total tells you how much survives without individual effort. The section split tells you where the risk sits.

Section A: Program design

Section A

Program design

Whether the program is set up to work at all.
0 / 4
01
Can every participant explain the program's purpose and what success should look like?
02
Are mentors briefed on expectations, boundaries and how to open the first conversation?
03
Is there an agreed program length and meeting cadence that participants committed to up front?
04
Does a named sponsor review the program's results at a fixed point every cycle?
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Section B: Momentum

Section B

Momentum

Whether it keeps running after launch energy fades.
0 / 4
05
Does matching use goals, skills, experience and preferences - not only availability or job title?
06
Can you see whether every matched pair has held a first meeting without chasing people individually?
07
Can you spot a relationship losing momentum early enough to intervene or rematch?
08
Can pairs schedule, log and follow up on sessions - including offline ones - without the program team in the middle?
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Section C: Evidence and scale

Section C

Evidence & scale

Whether you can prove it worked and do it again.
0 / 4
09
Is feedback captured immediately and consistently rather than reconstructed weeks later?
10
Can leadership see engagement, progress and outcomes without reading private conversations?
11
Would the program continue reliably if the coordinator were unavailable for two weeks?
12
Can you compare cohorts and use the evidence to improve matching and participant support?
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Your assessment is complete

Where should we reveal your result?

Enter your organisation email to unlock your score, section breakdown and recommended first move. Personal email addresses are not accepted.

Your result is ready below.
Something went wrong. Please try again or email support@mentorgain.com.

Your result appears immediately. No mailing list or generic product pitch.

0
/ 24

Your mentoring maturity read

Held up by individual effort

Your program depends on individual effort.

A
Program design
0 / 8
B
Momentum
0 / 8
C
Evidence & scale
0 / 8

What your pattern suggests

The section split matters more than the total.

Your overall score is useful. The section split shows where your operating risk sits.

Start here

Review the lowest-scoring dimension first and identify the manual work holding it together.

0 of 12 answered
Start with any question
Current score
0
/ 24
Answer all 12 to see your read